SAME OLD MCCAIN/SAME OLD KLEIN: McCain ran robocalls in 2000 too. Joe Klein agrees to forget: // link // print // previous // next //
MONDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2008
SAME OLD MCCAIN/SAME OLD KLEIN: Eight years ago, John McCain got slimed by robocalls during the South Carolina primary. Joe Klein described the matter last week at Swampland. He stressed the idea that John McCain has become a giant hypocrite:
McCain opposed the robocallsthen. Today, his campaign makes similar calls. Yesterday, Chris Wallace offered a similar critique on Fox News Sunday:
In reply, McCain said that his robocalls are legitimate and truthful, unlike the calls from Campaign 2000. We think that claim would be hard to sustainbut Wallace didnt address it.
In last weeks post, Klein stressed a favorite pundit notion. He stressed the idea that McCain has changedthat the honorable man of Campaign 2000 is playing a different game now. Klein said this, after quoting McCains most recent robocall:
For ourselves, we cant imagine what would be wrong with running accurate robocalls. But people like Klein rarely waste their time with such obvious points.
At any rate: According to Klein, McCains robocalls give us a look at John McCain, 2008 edition. He forgot to say what he surely knows: That McCain ran robocalls in Campaign 2000in that case, against George Bush. In some ways, those calls were worse than the calls McCain is now running. You see, McCain ran those robocalls anonymouslyand he and his aides flatly lied when asked if they were running them.
Pundits like Klein keep insisting that this is a new, different, vastly-changed McCain. It does make a wonderful, novelized tale. But we thought you might want to know the truth about Campaign 2000.
Joe Klein knows the facts which follow. We thought you should know them too.
McCains past robocall effort: Klein is right about one thing; McCain got badly slimed in South Carolina during the 2000 primary. But just for the record, McCain did manage to cut a few corners in that race himself. He had two local race men running his campaign, and he lied about his views on the confederate flag, a central issue in the state. He opened his campaign with TV ads which criticized Bush so harshly that, after Republican voters complained, he had to take them down. And uh-oh! After saying he would do no negative campaigning, he distributed attack fliers around the state, then repeatedly lied when asked about it. But so what? The press corps was on this great saints side, and they largely overlooked this conduct. Its true: McCain was badly trashed during South Carolina. But he cut quite a few corners himselfwhich led straight on to Michigan.
McCain was beaten in South Carolina on Saturday, February 19, 2000. After giving an angry speech, he flew directly to Michigan, whose primary would be held on Tuesday, February 22. In Michigan, he unleashed a wave of anonymous, negative robocalls; these calls, which went to Catholic voters, suggested that Bush was anti-Catholic. The AP began reporting the calls on Monday, February 21. Heres part of the New York Times first report, by James Bennet:
The McCain campaign denied any knowledge of the callsalthough the campaign was running the calls, as would soon become clear. But so what? The campaign kept lying about the calls until after the polls closed in Michigan. At that point, the McCain campaign admitted the truthhaving added Michigan to its win column. (For the record, McCains Catholic Voter Alert robocalls also ran in Washington, a state Bush won one week later.) By Thursday morning, David Broder was able to give a fuller report about McCains conduct:
The calls were nasty and anonymousand they were plainly inaccurate. (By that time, Bush had repeatedly criticized Jones past statements about Catholicism.) But so what? In subsequent days, McCain dissembled his way through a string of questions about the phone calls on major TV shows (links below); he defended his robocalls as accurate, although they plainly werent. When asked why hed lied about sponsoring the calls, he gave slippery non-answer answers; he kept pretending hed misunderstood when people asked if he was running the calls. Simply put, McCain was lying through his teethjust as hed done in South Carolina when he was asked about his campaigns attack fliers. But so what? To the press corps, John McCain was the worlds greatest saintand, within days, all was forgiven. Today, Klein pretends that McCains robocalls represent a break from the past. No, it isnt actually true. But it makes a simple, clean story. And it helps direct us away from Kleins past conduct.
Make no mistake: John McCain did get slimed by robocalls in South Carolina. Today, Klein is outraged by Bushs vile conduct. [The robocalls] were a craven, disgusting tactic by the George W. Bush campaign, he wrote in last weeks post.
Thats what Joe Klein writes today. But to help you understand how we all got here, we thought you might like the chance to recall what Klein was saying about these events in real time. And what a shock! In real time, Klein was soon boo-hoo-hooing about how nasty and negative Candidate Gore was. At the same time, he was describing Bush, who had run those disgusting calls, as one of the most decent guys ever!
You see, this was the spring of 2000and the press corps was staging its War Against Gore. McCain had been named a secular saintbut now, McCain was out of the race, and Bush was the press corps new favorite. Klein savages Bush for his robocallsnow. But in real time, things were different. Is there a bigger fraud than Joe Klein? We think you should read the full story:
George Bushwarm, decent guy: Today, Joe Klein is front-running nicely, bashing Bush for those past robocallsfor that craven, disgusting tactic. But in May 2000, when it actually mattered, Klein appeared on the cable show Russert, where he sang a different tune. On that show, he and his host battered Candidate Gorebecause the vile man had dared oppose Bushs proposals for Social Security (link below). And uh-oh! When he remembered the South Carolina race, Klein was quickly wetting his pants about the wonderful acts he had seen Candidate Bush perform there! Once again, this was Klein in May 2000, ten weeks after the South Carolina primary. He told Russert a story about that campaigna story which helped us see what a sweet, decent, kind man Bush actually was. This is how Klein went to Carolina in his mind, back when it actually mattered:
According to Klein, Bushs people had done these terrible things. But so what? He spent his time telling a story about what a decent guy Bush wasand this led him into a long discussion, in which he and Russert trashed Candidate Gore for being such a nasty attack dog! Bush got a pass for running those smears. It was Gore who got attacked as nasty and negativefor opposing privatization!
No. Were not making this up.
Just how bad did this nonsense get? The thing that Gore has to worry about is thisBush is legitimately a decent, kind, sweet guy, Klein soon told Russert. That smear campaign had been wiped from Kleins mind. Within moments, he even said this:
You see? According to Klein, Candidate Bush was the caring fellow, just like Candidate Clinton before him. By contrast, Candidate Gore was the nasty attack dog, the guy who was just scaring people. And yes: This is the way it actually was in the spring of 2000, as Klein and Russert (and their disgraceful mainstream cohort) staged their astonishing War Against Gore. According to Klein, it was Bush who had run those slimy phone callsbut Bush was now praised as sweet and decent. The thing that really rubbed Klein the wrong way was Gores stand against private accounts!
Klein and Russert went on and on that dayabout Gores attack-dog conduct!
Today, Klein savages Bush for those robocallsfor that craven, disgusting tactic. Back then, though, Candidate Gore was, by law, the press corps Official Vile Demon. Bush and McCain had run nasty, inaccurate, anonymous phone calls; according to Kleins reckoning, both men had then lied about their own conduct. But so what? Gore, why had done nothing like this at all, was now the target of Kleins condemnations. It was Gore who wouldnt stop attacking. Bush was sweet, decent and kind.
This is how we reached the point where McCain may yet end up in the White House. And this is why the dead of Iraq stare up in the face of Joe Klein. Why on earth would any liberal put up with a guy like Joe Klein?
Visit our incomparable archives: Klein and Russert went onand onabout Gores attack-attack-attacks on poor Bush. How dare he oppose those private accounts? But then, a long string of big pundits were reciting this script as their War Against Gore gathered steam. For more of Russert and Kleins discussion, see THE DAILY HOWLER, 6/7/07. To see other pundits say the same thing, see THE DAILY HOWLER, 5/20/02. (Scroll down to The Daily Update.)
We discussed McCains 2000 robocalls in real time. See THE DAILY HOWLER, 2/24/00, 2/25/00 and 2/29/00. To see Chris Matthews fumble and flail with McCain on this topic, see THE DAILY HOWLER, 3/3/00. McCain dissembled his way through a string of shows, After that, all was forgiven.