TAKING THE KINSLEY CHALLENGE! The GOP plays the game better, he said. Reviewing his work, we saw why: // link // print // previous // next //
MONDAY, AUGUST 25, 2008
THE EXCITEMENT STARTS TONIGHT: Not in Denverhere in Baltimore, where well help broadcast the Democratic convention each night from 8-11 on WEAA, 88.9, The Voice of the CommunityMorgan State Universitys NPR affiliate. Each night, well be in the studio with anchor Anthony McCarthy and other exciting guests. Live from Denver, co-anchoring hearty: Marc Steiner and Lea Gilmore.
Some of you may make the mistake of watching the convention, on TVs. But if you want to listen each night, you know what to do: Just click here. Then hit Listen live, right at the top of the page.
Right away, of course, this raises questions about our past connection to one of Morgans most famous alumniMarvin Webster, The Human Eraser. Didnt you play with Webster in the 1971 Baltimore summer league, readers will inevitably ask.
As a matter of fact, we didand after Marvelous conquered his sense of awe at the chance to play with someone of our ability, he settled in for a nice campaign, the inaugural season in the summer program run by hands-on commissioner Wes Unseld. Along with Webster, we featured 6-6 Leon Love, on his way to Tennessee after having set the Baltimore schoolboy single-game rebounding record at Carver. (If memory servesand we think it does.) How tough was that first summer league? Even with Webster and Love, we finished 8-8. And it certainly wasnt anything we did that kept us from championship hardware!
Morgan Stategreat then, great today! Weve never blamed Marvin for those defeats, and we dont plan to start now.
From the early days: A nice piece from Sports Illustrated, in the early days, about a very decent guy. And another piece, a few decades later.
PART 1EASY TO PLAY THE GAME HARD: Can the Democratic Party make its way into the White House? To all intents and purposes, that question starts getting answered tonight.
By way of warning, well caution against over-reliance on that year of the Democrat theory. In this, the new Washington Post/ABC poll, 36 percent of registered voters self-identified as Democrats, versus only 26 percent who self-identified as Republicans. (With leaners, the Democratic Partys advantage was 52-41.) But only 23 percent of registered voters self-identified as liberals, versus 33 percent who said they were conservatives; this conveys a bit of an advantage in the other directionalthough, presumably, most of those people are in the Republican camp. (In Julys survey, the liberal/conservative split was 19-35.) And then too, theres the ongoing problem Michael Kinsley discussed, or seemed to discuss, in Saturdays Washington Post.
Kinsley, the brightest man of the 1980s, is still a major American journalista major voice of the career liberal world. At one point in Saturdays column, he offered a familiar old claim about one way our politics works:
Liberal journalists like Kinsley have peddled this framework roughly forevereven as their own journalistic conduct makes it a self-fulfilling prophecy. After all, it isnt hard to play the game better when a lazy, indolent mainstream press corps is willing to peddle your twaddle for you, no matter how foolish your twaddle may be. Have Republicans played the game hard? Its quite easy to be hardwith journos like Kinsley around.
How easy has it been, in recent elections, for Republicans to play the game better? By way of illustration, consider the high-minded observation Jonathan Alter has just made in Newsweek.
Like Kinlsey, Alter is a major liberal journalist. In the current edition of Newsweek, he offers the following high-minded insights. Hes discussing recent name-calling aimed at McCain and Obama:
Al Gore never said it, Alter now says. But back in real time, when it actually mattered, it was easy for Republicans to drive the campaign which sent George Bush to the White House. You see, heres what Alter was saying back then, back in real time, when it actually mattered. His column appeared on October 9, 2000, six days after Bush and Gores first debate. Much of what Alter wrote in this passage is astounding. In the second paragraph, well highlight the point thats directly relevant to his new column:
On October 9, when that column appeared, world history hung in the balance. And guess what? It was easy to be a Republican hit-manwhen liberal journalists were willing to type pure twaddle like that on your behalf.
Much of that passage is simply astounding. Alter used three potent words quite freelyliar, lies and lying. He even descended to the point of saying that Candidate Gore may be such a big liar because his mother was a big liar too. And of course, he cited gong-show examples of Gores fibbing and lying. In fact, Gores union lullaby statement was an obvious joke, as even Bob Novak had written, weeks earlier. And no, Gore didnt mak[e] up a story about his mother-in-law and his dog. As best anyone ever showed, Gores statements were perfectly accurate. (There was no full transcript or tape of what he had actually said.) Gores accurate data, about prescription drug prices, had come from a widely-cited House study. And his statements about his mother-in-law and his dog were accurate too. In fact, Gores mother-in-law and his pet dog had been prescribed the same arthritis drugthe drug at issue in the House study. Which part of Gores statement was a story? Alter forgot to say.
By the way: Who was the source of the ballyhooed claim that Gore lied about those doggy pills? As Newsweeks Evan Thomas reported a few weeks later, the claim had been funneled to the Boston Globes Walter Robinsonby Bush campaign hack Dan Bartlett. For Republicans, it was easy to be good at the game when mainstream journalists would peddle your bull-roar for you. It was easy playing hard with these guys at your command.
But we especially mention Alters eight-year-old column because of that passage from his new piece. Al Gore never actually said, I invented the Internet, Alter writes this weekeight years after he wrote the column which threw that claim into an unholy stew about Gores fibbing and lying. It was easy to be a Republican then, with people like Alter playing that game. Sorry, but Republicans didnt have to play the game with genius, courage, creativity, as Kinsley pretends. They just had to peddle their bull-roarand then watch the Alters recite.
In Saturdays column, Kinsley claims that Republicans have played the game better down through the years. We have a sardonic view of that hoary old claim, so we made an instant decision: We decided to take the Kinsley Challenge! We decided to look at Kinsleys work in the elections he cites in his column. When we did, we saw why it has been easy for Republicans to play the game well.
TOMORROWPART 2: Kinsley discusses the media
Alters full-blown crisis: Of course, heres the most ludicrous sentence from that old Alter column. It was easy being hardwhen journalists were phoning it in from Mars:
In fact, the alleged fibbing had blossom[ed] into a full-blown credibility crisis for Gore nineteen months earlier, in March 1999. Thats when invented the Internet started, becoming an instant point of ridicule all through the mainstream press. This very week, writing bravely in Newsweek, a Kinsley type tells us that Gore never said it. We thought you should see what he said in real timewhen he and his colleagues made it so easy for GOP types to play hard.