WHAT, THEM WORRY? CNN reported an astonishing factin just over 300 words: // link // print // previous // next //
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2009
Maher and Maddow, at the heart of our politics: Yesterday, two important new polls took us to the heart of American politics. These polls were actually information surveys: Voters were asked a series of questions about the contents and consequences of President Obamas still un-formulated health reform plan.
In this post, Steve Benen discussed the first of these information surveys, the one conducted by Research 2000 for The Daily Kos. Respondents were asked four questionsquestions which were formulated about as well as is possible. For example, heres one of the questions:
A plan is not a bill, of course. A bit of uncertainty thus lurks in that question, given the fact that Obamas plan hasnt produced a final bill. But a fully-formed bill does exist in the House, and it seems to have been the principal source of the angst which has surrounded this particular question. And no: The House bill would not require elderly patients to meet with government officials to discuss end of life options including euthanasia. Instead, it specifies a Medicare payment provision; under the proposed bill, Medicare would pay for a consultation between a recipient and her doctor about end-of-life options. No one would be required to meet with her doctor. No government officials would be at that meeting. Euthanasia would still be illegal.
But so what? In the Research 2000 poll, 19 percent of respondents answered yes to this question; an additional 23 percent said they werent sure of the answer. Heres another of the four questions: Is Medicare a government program or not? Seventeen percent of respondents said it isnt, or that they arent sure.
This brings us to heart of our American politics.
As weve noted here for years, the American public is almost always stunningly misinformed, on almost every major issue. Steve Benen offers a good post on this poll, one wed recommend. But wed have to say that Steve seems a bit under-informed in this passage as well:
Steve goes on to note the partisan numbers. By far, Republicans were more likely to be misinformed on these four questions than Democrats or independents. But Steve seems to be amazed at the degree of false belief. Later, he cites Greg Sargent:
We have no idea why this would be astonishing. In fact, its a typical pattern in American politics. The public is almost always misinformed on matters like this. To our ear, when Steve and Greg react this way, they seem slightly misinformed too.
As weve said in recent weeks: This country is full of people whose political thinking is quite unsophisticated. They didnt go to graduate school. They never got to be Rhodes Scholars. They didnt grow up in a fancy Village, featuring wonderful Village services. They tend to believe the things theyre toldon talk radio, for exampleand their beliefs are thus constantly wrong. By the way: We liberals often behave this way too. Remember when Candidate Obama seemed to say that he would meet with Kim Jung-Il in his first year, without preconditions? At the time, we noted a blindingly obvious fact: Plainly, no such meetings would ever occur. Readers swore we were wrongand Obama got to call Hillary Clinton Bush-lite because she said she wouldnt hold such meetings. Foolishly, waves of liberals believed what Obama said.
We liberals can be a bit dumb on occasion too. But then, how many Einsteins do you see around here? Dumb is the human condition!
At any rate, the public is always misinformed about major policy matters. This perpetual state of ignorance is as American as apple pie. If you dont understand this basic fact, you dont understand our politics. (Every pol understands this fact, although they dont discuss it.) The public was wildly misinformed in 1993 about the Clinton budget plan (see THE DAILY HOWLER 7/26/06, with links to earlier reporting.) After that, the public was wildly misinformed about Clintons health care proposal. (Duh! Betsy McCaughey invented some of the basic bullshit about the Clinton and Obama plans! And we liberals keep letting her do it.)
This is the norm in American politicsand yet, we liberals are constantly caught by surprise when more ignorance appears. Were surprised when the sun comes upand we insist on calling folks on the other team dumb!
We thought Steves focus was off a bit in that post. Last night, Rachel Maddow and Bill Maher took matters substantially further. By now, a new NBC News poll had also appeared. (To see the full poll, just click here.) It too featured some grisly results about four factual questions (see question 15)although wed say its questions tended to be more problematic than those in the Kos poll.
(Full disclosure: Were big admirers of Maher around here; almost no one can do what he does. Wait a minute, people often say. Didnt you and Bill do New Years Eve 1983 at the Richmond Comedy Clubalong with Dan Rosen, of course? Well yes, we did, we promptly reply. Earlier that week, we were impressed by the way Bill got on the phone and forced the clubs owner to send over light bulbs for the condo. Bill was a comedy veteran thenand we were just a raw rookie. How clueless were we in those days? Wed have purchased the light bulbs ourselves!)
Last night, Rachel asked Bill to discuss these new information surveys. As usual, Rachel seemed utterly clueless about the results of these polls. She even used that word again! The ignorance this summer has seemed inexplicable, she said, before she brought Bill on. To watch the full segment, click this:
On Monday, Rachel found Obamas apparent shift on the public option inexplicable. Last night, she said this summers public ignorance had seemed that way too. Soon, Rachel and Bill (Mr. Maher!) were scratching each others backsand Rachel was revealing more of her political inexperience:
Maddow was weirded out by the most predictable pattern on earth. In the liberal world, our Rhodes Scholars react this way! And we rush to call disabled former employees of Murrys Steaks dumb.
In our view, Bill didnt bathe himself in glory as he discussed the current ignorancebut his hosts analysis was just plain weak. At one point, she suggested that Republicans get these ideas from Foxwhile offering no examples from the networks actual programming. (Well guess that, on some of these questions, the disinformation may come from talk radio more. But would it kill us to offer examples of disinformation being dished?) She basked in the fact that only 41 percent of MSNBC/CNN viewers wrongly believe health care reform will give coverage to illegal immigrants. That seemed good, because 72 percentage of Fox viewers think the same thing. (By the way: Since no final bill exists, were technically dealing in speculation in questions like this.) As she introduced Mr. Maher, she voiced her surprise at the fact that Republican voters are so misinformed. (They exist in their own fact-impaired mini-verse inside what we thought was a universe. No wonder were not getting anywhere.) Finding this whole thing inexplicable, she was soon asking Bill what to do:
Maybe we should spend another week making sex jokes about these people and calling them stupid tea-baggers! Maybe that will help! (Maybe Keith should bring Janeane Garofalo out again to announce that theyre all redneck racists!) Maddow, surprised by this state of affairs. seemed bollixed about the best way to proceed. But then, people who dont understand that a problem exists rarely spend a lot time figuring how to address it. Soon, she dreamed a wonderful dreama dream of the unsophisticated:
Maybe root beer will come out of water taps too! Well, you think it would have happened by now, Mr. Maher gently said, because this has been going on for weeks and weeks at this point.
Soon, Rachel was on to her standard claims about how we have those 60 Dem senators. The fact that many come from bright red states rarely seems to intrude. (Two examples: Lincoln and Pryor come from Arkansas. Their state favored McCain by 20 pointsand that was before the damage which has been done in the recent commotions. To a political ingenue like Maddow, its inexplicable if they dont support the public option.)
For our money, Maddow has been doing better work in recent weeks. She has largely dropped her insultingly tedious pseudo-reporting about John Ensigns sex romp. At long last, she has begun to report on the health reform issue. (What a shame that she wasnt using her brain to figure out ways to approach this topic long ago.)
But people! Until we manage to solve the problem, massive public disinformation will lie at the soul of American politics! Rush Limbaugh broadcasts complete total shitand people believe it, in droves. Those people are driven further into Rushbos arms when people like Maddow diddle themselves with endless sexual insults and other forms of name-callingwhen they insist on kicking down at the working-class people below them. Its stunning to think that our liberal Rhodes Scholar finds the current ignorance inexplicable. No wonder her approach to these matters has at times been so crude and counter-productive. Despite her ballyhooed brilliance, she apparently never knew about the basic problem.
But then, her boss had no background in news before he came to her network. His background was in sports and comedy. He was on the air in one of Maddows comedy skits last night.
Alas! Weve been noting this misinformation syndrome for years. Weve begged liberals and liberal journals to start kicking upto go directly to working-class people and tell them theyre being lied to by Rush. To approach major news orgs and insist that they treat disinformation as what it ismajor news. But weve learned a key fact along the way: The modern liberal cant be educated. We prove it when we rush into the streets, eager to call disabled workers from Murrys Steaks crazy. When we insist on kicking down. When we trash the Craig Anthony Millers, instead of going right at the people who lead people like Miller astray. When our highest lords praise the Tony Blankleys, and mock the average voters.
To borrow from Pogo, weve met the clueless. Explicably, it seems to be us.
PART 2WHAT, THEM WORRY: Atul Gawande and his associates announced a familiar framework. Were not Europe, they announced, at the start of their piece about health care costs (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 8/18/09). They would ignore the foreign experience, focusing on some American systems which had reduced the cost of providing health care.
Like so many before them, they would thereby ignore the data which suggest the stunning waste involved in American health care. Here are two such figures; well post two more below:
According to the OECD, Great Britain spent about 40 percent as much per person as the United States did. But so what? Telling us that were not Europe, Gawandes team moved past the challenge of explaining those stunning data. Instead, they focused on relatively minor savings found in some parts of the U.S. health system.
No, Gawande isnt involved in a plotand his piece was quite informative. But the American discourse concerning health care is routinely conducted this way. The discussion weve maintained through the years often seems like a form of pure madness. It seems that no data, no matter how startling, can pierce the lethargy gripping the mainstream pressand the career liberal world.
Just consider the data CNN reported last Tuesdaybarely batting an eye as it did.
John Roberts, guest hosting on AC 360, teased the upcoming segment. Up next, the cost of doing nothing. The staggering amount of waste in health care, the handsome anchor intoned. And the waste is massive, Roberts promised. You think it's millionsbillions? he asked. Think higherway higher!
Thus teased, the analysts all sat forward in their rough wooden chairs.
When Roberts returned from commercial break, he outlined the upcoming report. The United States is flat-out wasting half the money it spends on health care, he said. He struggled to suppress a yawn as he made this remarkable statement:
Say what? According to a new PriceWaterhouse study, the United States is flat-out wasting fully half of what it spends on health care! Given the European data, that number should hardly be shocking, of coursebut Roberts was willing to give it the old CNN try. How could we be wasting that much money? he wondered. And what's it being wasted on? Tom Foreman came on to deliver the report, detailing the remarkable claim made in that new study.
You can read CNNs full segment yourselves; just click here. And it shouldnt take you long to do it: CNN gave Foreman all of 334 words to report the startling fact that half our health care spending is wasted. Staggering amount of money, Roberts said, before moving on to another key topic. A new raid in the Michael Jackson investigation, he said, teasing his viewers again.
Must we tell you that this report went on about three times as long as Foremans? Half your health care spending is waste? Michael Jackson is more key, by far.
What did Foreman actually report about U.S. health spending? To see the PriceWaterhouse study, click herealthough, to our taste, the study has a few problems. The alleged waste is broken down into three categoriesand it seems to us that were dealing with a bit of an apples-and-oranges problem. (To us, allegedly preventable disease is a different cat from useless paperwork.) But for what its worth, how did PriceWaterhouse reach the claim that up to $1.2 trillion is wasted? Heres the nugget graf from the studys Key Findings:
Do patients ever get redundant treatment for preventable disease? If so, might we have some double-counting here? (At the end of the Key Finding, PriceWaterhouse seems to say no.) But Foreman reviewed the three categories, giving (partial?) dollar figures for two. Oddly, he seemed to treat preventable disease as the most significant of the three areas, although Price Waterhouse plainly said that redundant/inappropriate/ unnecessary medical procedures represented the biggest area of excess. Who knows? Maybe CNN didnt want to be piling on the doctors. Doctors are popular in the U.S. CNN would like to be too!
There are two ways to look at Foremans report.
On the one hand, he seemed to reported a staggering factauthoring the type of report few other news orgs are attempting. Where does all our health spending go? Anyone would ask that question after reviewing the data from Europedata Foreman never mentioned, of course. Were spending more than twice as much as Britainand were getting similar outcomes? Who is looting all our money? Its astounding to see how rarely any news org tries to answer that question. To CNNs credit, it authored such a report last Tuesday night.
Foreman at least went through the motions, reporting that half your money is wasted. On the other hand, there was very little sign that CNN had the slightest sense of the magnitude of the claim made in Foremans report.
Half our money is being wasted? On CNN, this stunning claim rated 300 words. But then, watching your nation pretend to discuss health care is often a great deal like watching mental illness spread.
Your nations intellectual culture is deeply challenged; were intellectually sick to the core. We seem incapable of real discussion. Tomorrow, well watch a cable star report the foreign experience. On Friday, things will get worse.
TomorrowPart 3: Omigod! A cable star goes there!
A few more data: Trust us: Globetrekker will cover these data before the press corps does! Today, we add spending figures for Italy and France (click here). Each system is highly regarded:
Total spending on health care, per person, 2007:
Those data are simply astounding. The press doesnt seem to have heard.