KLEIN REINVENTS! Klein said McCain was almost laughable. Today, though, he rewrites the facts: // link // print // previous // next //
FRIDAY, MAY 19, 2006
THE COURAGE TO CONQUER: John McCain is charming, funny, intelligent and heroic. We know this because Michael Kinsley tells us, in a somewhat confused op-ed column in this mornings Post. What is confused about Kinsleys piece? Kinsley seems to think that conservatives dislike McCain even though they agree with him on the issues—on his strong right-to-life stand on abortion, for example. In fact, many conservatives dont like McCain because they disagree with him on various issues—and because they dont trust him on abortion, in large part due to his endless shape-shifting on the issue during Campaign 2000. No, McCain didnt talk straight on abortion back then—he tended to say all things to all people—but all is forgiven in the national press. After all, you know the great rule: John McCain must always be fawned to. And yes, this rule finds slavish adherence. For example, heres how Kinsley judges two graduation speeches by this greatest of all living saints:
KINSLEY (5/19/06): In his pre-campaign for president, McCain is delivering four university graduation speeches. He gave two already, at Falwell's Liberty University and at Columbia University. His words to these two different audiences are quite similar (a brilliantly McCainian combination of laziness and courage). Read the texts. They are marvelous: witty, self-mocking, above all interesting. When McCain climbs onto an old warhorse like, say, filial obligation, you really do not know where he might take it. It would be wonderful to have a president whose speeches weren't a duty to listen to.Were McCains speeches marvelous: witty, self-mocking, above all interesting? That, of course, is a matter of judgment. (For ourselves, wed judge somewhat differently.) But note the additional judgment weve highlighted. When McCain gives the same speech at two different schools, Kinsley admits that hes been a bit lazy. But so what! Rules are rules! McCains performance was also brilliant—and, of course, it showed his courage! Remember: Every gesture, every word, must, by law, display McCains courage. Theres simply nothing the great man can do that the Kinsleys cant find ways to fawn to.
That said, we were intrigued by the following anecdote:
KINSLEY: Journalists love him, of course. His frankness flatters us, and he flatters us more directly as well. Visiting a big convention of journalists last fall, McCain joined a group that was gambling at the hotel casino until the wee hours. In his speech the next morning, he cleverly nailed his audience and himself by declaring that he was happy to be among my base.So clever! So honest! So refreshingly frank! But yes, we were intrigued by this picture of major journalists pal-ling around with the man they will cover when he starts his run for the White House. Did any of these high-minded scribes excuse themselves from the casino when McCain showed up to schmooze them till the wee hours? Did any journalist remove himself? Did any refuse to be fraternized?
Well offer much more about the press corps fraternization—and about McCains flattery—in the series we run next week. But for the record, the convention to which Kinsley refers was the American Magazine Conference, held at the Wyndham El Conquistador in Fajardo, Puerto Rico last October. After the conference, Jeff Bercovici of Womens Wear Daily wrote a column in which he gave out some awards. One of them went to the conquistador himself—to McCain:
BERCOVICI (10/21/05): Second-Best Bill Clinton Impression: John McCain. In the middle of a two-hour gambling session, the Arizona senator introduced himself to an attractive young brunette and invited her to join him at the craps table. He soon declared the woman, who was attending the conference on behalf of a Rhode Island-based technology firm, to be his lucky charm, and forbade her to leave while his winning streak lasted.Not that theres anything wrong with it! For the record, Bercovici described a bit more of McCains marathon session in this short earlier post.
One more time, well spell this out. We think McCain is a perfectly OK guy. But when journalists insist on describing his endless vast courage, they are deciding the next White House race. In Campaign 2000, they invented a demon; this time around, theyve invented a saint. Dems and liberals said nothing back then. This time, the pattern is clear—and the time to start complaining is now. Or have we become such a bunch of whipped dogs that were too dumb and beat down to do it? Well guess at the answer now: Yes.
PROLOGUE—KLEIN REINVENTS: In Campaign 2000, they invented a demon—and thereby sent George Bush to the White House. This time around, theyve invented a saint—and Democrats must start complaining right now. All next week, well offer you the comical story of the way this saint—this great Saint McCain—was invented by the press corps during Campaign 2000, as he flattered them on his fine bus. But make no mistake—he still gets treated like a saint, even now. Indeed, the sanctification has gone on for so long that recitation of this script has become second nature for career writers. Example: Consider the way Joe Klein reinvents McCain in his definingly awful new pseudo-book, the horrible Politics Lost.
In his book, Klein begins discussing McCains 2000 campaign with an inspiring note about health care. As usual, the solons work is beyond compare—at least, the way Klein recalls it:
KLEIN (page 165): If Jerry Browns Maryland campaign was the most fun Ive ever had covering politics, McCains New Hampshire race was the most exhilarating. This was a candidate without fear, speaking in the plainest possible language. I never saw him duck a question, and his best responses had a startling clarity. Asked about health-care reform, for example, he said: The problem is the Democrats are in the pocket of the trial lawyers and we Republicans are in the pocket of the insurance companies. And so there is gridlock, and there will continue to be, until we get the special-interest influence out of politics.But did McCains answer display startling clarity? In fact, youll note one problem with his answer; it fails to offer any ideas about successful reform! Indeed, when McCain finally presented his health plan in December 1999, its half-baked quality drew much comment, even from some mainstream reporters. For example, heres paragraph 2 of Michael Kranishs report in the next days Boston Globe:
KRANISH (12/15/00): McCain's speech was filled with broad statements about how it was unacceptable to have so many uninsured people, but his language was vague in many areas and he left out some detailed cost estimates. Asked after his speech to say how many of the uninsured would be covered under his various proposals, he responded: "Off the top of my head, half of them." A McCain spokesman said the total cost of the senator's program would be $4.3 billion in the first year, rising to $7.6 billion by the fifth year.Others reported the fact that McCains aides were still calculating those basic figures several hours after his speech. And Kranish noted this slapdash approach on the part of McCain himself. (Kranish: [I]n a statement that characterized much of his speech yesterday, McCain added: If the package of reform I've outlined isn't enough to do the job, we'll do more.) But Kranish was hardly the only scribe noting McCains what-me-worry approach to health care. Two weeks later, in the Washington Monthly, Stephen Pomper gave McCain a grade of D-plus for his campaign performance on this issue. When it came to health care, McCain has trouble staying on topic, Pomper noted—and at some length, he explained what he meant. Pomper describes a Republican debate held on December 2, 1999:
POMPER (1/1/00): McCain supported Senator John Chafee's reform proposal in 1991 but disappeared during the great national debates and has only recently started to talk about health care again...But even today, he has not made the issue a strong priority and he has trouble staying on topic.Pomper quoted the moderator restating her question—and he quoted McCain veering off-topic again.(We offer the full transcript below.) In short, McCain had next to nothing to say about health care—except for the statement Klein cites in his book, a statement which made him look like a conquering hero in contrast to the two corrupted parties. The Internet is important. But so is health care, Pomper wrote as he gave McCain his D-plus. But so what? Six years later, Klein uses health care as the prime example of the way McCain never ducked a question. In fact, in the debate which Pomper cites, McCain used the very statement Klein cites to do that very thing.
But then, scribes like Klein have long been brilliant at ignoring McCains intellectual laziness, or even at turning it into an asset. (See Kinsley, Michael.) As he continues in Politics Lost, Klein makes a silk purse from the weathered sows ear of McCains hapless policy work during Campaign 2000:
KLEIN (page 166): [S]oon top editors from New York and Washington were trooping up to New Hampshire for rides of the Straight Talk Express, a road show that was part press conference, part borscht belt comedy routine, and occasional trial by fire. Every time a new big shot boarded the bus, armed with gotcha question and anxious to challenge the candidates vaunted candor, McCain would disarm him in the simplest possible way: he would admit that he had made a mistake or had gotten something wrong or didnt know the answer. He did this constantly, and it was always successful.According to Klein, McCain was constantly explaining that he didnt know the answers to journalists questions—and this was successful with the press every time. But then, anyone who reads the profiles of McCain from Campaign 2000 will note a highly comical fact; it seems that McCain made thoroughly uninformed statements on virtually every major policy issue at some point during this race. (Next week, well recall a string of these misadventures.) But before we close todays report, lets recall another Big Scribe who noted McCains awful work with health care during Campaign 2000. And yes, you guessed it—that scribe is Joe Klein! In his definingly awful new Politics Lost, Klein specifically cites health care when he says that McCain never gave a bad answer. But in a New Yorker profile during Campaign 2000, Klein recorded awkward exchanges with McCain about a string of policy matters. When asked about the current state of welfare reform, he admitted that he hadnt given much thought to the hard-core unemployables who soon may be left without benefits, Klein wrote. Nor had he given much thought to the estimated thirty percent of teen-age pregnancies that, according to some studies, may be the result of statutory rapes. And uh-oh! These were hardly McCains only problem areas; McCain was also boggled by health care, Klein wrote in this piece. Indeed, Klein recalled the embarrassing scene when McCain released his health care plan in December—the scene which Kranish had mocked:
KLEIN (1/17/00): Health care isnt easy, but McCain is running for president. He had just released, with no small fanfare, a plan, but it was almost laughably sketchy—with no real answers for the forty-four million people without health insurance, many of whom work at low-wage jobs. (Even the accompanying fact sheet was filled with errors.)Uh-oh! In real time, Klein said that McCain had been almost laughably sketchy on health care, even when he presented his formal plan. Even his fact sheet had been filled with errors, Klein pointed out in real time. Today, though all has been reinvented. Today, Klein chooses this very issue as the prime example of McCains campaign brilliance. This was a candidate without fear, speaking in the plainest possible language, were told. I never saw him duck a question, and his best responses had a startling clarity.
But then, as weve seen for the past eight years, there is simply nothing these people wont do to make the facts conform to their scripts. Today, your astonishing press corps has found a great saint—and theyre willing to lie to get you to love him. During Campaign 2000, McCain floundered and evaded badly on health care—his work was almost laughably sketchy, Klein wrote. Today, though, all is forgotten—disappeared. In a book which pretends to seek an authentic politics, Joe Klein shows that he knows his cohorts great rules. Every gesture must show McCains greatness. Every speech must show his great brilliance—even those which were deemed to be laughable back when they actually occurred.
VISIT OUR INCOMPARABLE ARCHIVES: Simply put, theres nothing Klein wont say or do to make the facts conform to his scripts. In the passages we quote above, he reinvents McCain as a saint. To see him reinvent Gore as a demon, see THE DAILY HOWLER, 5/3/06. In Politics Lost, Klein reinvents the facts about Gore—just as he does with McCain. And as he does, he keeps insisting—he wants a more authentic politics!
FULLER TRANSCRIPT: Heres the fuller transcript of McCain as he evades on health care. (Pomper nailed this session quite accurately—although this was not the first GOP debate.) The moderator who questioned McCain was WMUR-TVs Karen Brown. Two weeks later, McCain presented his health care plan—and it was almost laughable:
BROWN (12/2/99): Senator McCain, several major HMOs are failing financially. The system isn't working. There is rampant patient dissatisfaction. What do you propose to fix it?At this point, McCain was finally saved by that bell; it was time for Brit Hume to question Gary Bauer. And now? Seven years after this gruesome performance, were told that the saint never gave a bad answer. I never saw him duck a question, a definingly awful book says.
But so it goes as the Washington press corps picks our next U.S. president for us. If Democrats arent happy with this, they need to start talking back—now.
CHAIT SWOONS: In a recent column in the Los Angeles Times, Jonathan Chait recalls Campaign 2000—and explains his own swoon for McCain. Since he mentions McCain and health care, we thought wed toss it in now:
CHAIT (4/23/06): My swoon over McCain was for ideological reasons. McCain adopted all sorts of positions I shared. And his reasons seemed genuine. When he came to Congress, he had little expertise in issues other than the military, and thus tended to follow the Republican crowd. As he told me in 2000, "I was probably a 'supply-sider' based on the fact that I really didn't jump into the issue."Say what? As a candidate, McCain came into contact with middle-income Americans who were concerned about healthcare? At the time, McCain had served in the House and the Senate for sixteen years. Does anyone know why he waited until he ran for the White House to come into contact with middle-income Americans?
As well see next week, career journalists love to admit to the swoon—and then they unashamedly show it. In many ways, McCain was an utter embarrassment during Campaign 2K. Some swooners disappear that fact now. Other explain it away.